ANCIENT HISTORY OF
ARATTA-UKRAINE:
20,000 BCE – 1000 CE
by
YURI SHILOV
Abstract
This book describes the scientific study of the origins of Slavic ethnic culture. Whilst officially this history
dates only from 1000 BCE to 1000 CE, the author offers sound reasons for
extending this period back even further, not only to 3rd but also
the 7th, and even the 20th millenium
BCE, disclosing for the first time the reality of ancient doctrines and their
content.
Since the era of Ancient Greece, the population of Eastern Europe had
been regarded as uncivilized and barbarous. This biased view was strengthened
by Byzantium which, having converted to Christianity in CE 330, reinforced the
oppression of pagans via Church authority. However, because Eastern Slavs (modern
Ukrainians, Belarusians and Russians) accepted Christianity later than other
European nations (CE 988 - 1386) they were allocated the last place in the
hierarchy of civilization.
Acceptance of this viewpoint was sustained until recent times, promoted
by a Science that rendered service to political doctrines sanctioned by the
Church and this might have continued had the revolutions and wars of the 19th
– 20th centuries not compelled mankind to seek to understand
the true foundations and prospects of civilisation in order to avert future
disasters. Thus, ruling authorities permitted scholars to probe deeper into
facts far older than the slave-holding times. The author shows that by the end
of the 20th century, even the doctrine of historical materialism had
been recognised to be a continuation of the biblical policy towards Òthe
ApocalypseÓ and this was not the way promised by Marxist-Leninists towards the
bright future for all mankind. A new investigative methodology, focusing on the
Trinity paradigm, now pointed to the reality of a Golden Age, an upsurge of
civilization that preceded the slave-holding system and that was returning
again according to predictions of Holy Writs that pre-date the Bible.
Such documents and their pagan priests had been
ruthlessly destroyed by the Churches in Europe and the Middle East. However,
the Òworld religionsÓ of Semitic origin were powerless to overcome the
ÒpaganismÓ in India, China and Japan which closely
preserved their own traditional qualities. It is therefore necessary to study
the reasons for the colonisers failure to deharmonise and revolutionise the cultures of Indo-China.
The Indian Vedas, such as the Rigveda and also the epic poems of the Ramayana and Маhabharata, became a key source
for the study of pre-Christian cultural stability. Calendar studies show that
Vedic doctrines were founded by Brahman priests from the middle of the 5th
to the end of the 2nd millenium BCE, i.e.
long before the Bible had been written. According to Judaic chronology this was
even before the world had come into being, yet Vedic doctrines speak of the
self-creation of the universe taking place about 4,320 million years ago,
corresponding to modem scientific concepts about the formation of the Earth and
Solar System. This brought together a wonderful closeness of the pre-Christian
cultures of Europe and India that originated from the migrations of Arian
tribes in mid-2nd millenium BCE, leading
researchers to seek the ancestral homeland of the Arians and thus of the Vedic
culture they had created.
All ethno-historical zones across Eurasia have been surveyed with
reference to the Vedas but although the scientists were guided by MankindÕs
aspiration for a Saviour doctrine about the cyclic recurrence of the Golden
Age, they were also guided by the political ambitions of national interests and
religious competition. Even so, the search gradually narrowed around the Dnipro area of Ukraine.
Whilst the notorious problem of the Arians became linked with facist ideologies, the search for their ancestral homeland
actually began, in 1820, by the German geographer K. Ritter who raised the
question about the similarity of Indo-Arians with the (S)indics [Hindus] of the Kuban area in ancient times.
Much later, in 1942, the same position was forwarded by the
Austrian linguist P. Krechmer who pointed out
that Old Sindic (after Herodotus), was located in the
lower reaches of the Borysthenes (River Dnipro). Since then there have been many international publications which have collectively confirmed the ancestral
homeland of Arians to have been in the Dnipro area.
In the 20th – 17th millennia BCE, when the
greatest cold period occurred in Europe, a land called Aratta,
well organised by priests, was formed between the Carpathians and Caucasus, the
Volga and the Danube. This was a well developed region
of mammoth hunters but the subsequent environmental changes that brought about
the extinction of those animals also led to the demise of Aratta.
By the 12th millennium BCE the last of its wisdom keepers were
concentrated in the grottoes of the sanctuary called Stone Grave (near Melitopol). Their successors formed a second major cultural
zone between the Carpathians and the Baltic region from where, in the 9th
millennium BCE, a resettlement of Eurasians (or ÒSvidertiansÓ)
began in both the Urals and along the north and south coasts of the Black Sea.
There, the last of these hunter-gatherers began cattle-raising and primitive
agriculture, triggering the beginning of the Great Neolithic Revolution. The
largest settlement of those Òpre-Indo-EuropeansÓ, or ÒTukhuniansÓ
(direct descendants of ÒEuroasian-SvidertiansÓ) lay
near ‚atal HšyŸk in modern
Turkey. However, the ecological-demographic catastrophe of the mid 7th
millenium BCE compelled them to drift closer together
with the related keepers of Stone Grave who, having invented a written
language, had begun the most ancient Sacred texts during that time. Recorded
here in writing, in 6200 ± 97 BCE, is the worlds first
known agreement about mutual aid. That event marks the beginning of the ÒState
of ArattaÓ, and along with it, the beginning of world
civilization.
The State of Aratta was the embodiment of the
ÒGolden AgeÓ and the foundation of the ÒIndo-EuropeansÓ. This has only been
learned about 10 – 15 years ago even in Ukraine, where these studies started, and even now
it is practically unknown in western countries. This book traces its
development through the Buh-Dniester and Sursk-Dnipro cultures to its apotheosis, known as the ÒTrypillian archaeological cultureÓ. Aratta
was considered by Sumer as its ancestral homeland, from which it had become separated by Òthe DelugeÓ in the mid 4th
millennium BCE when the Mediterranean flooded the Black Sea area. That
well trodden road between Aratta and Sumer had become
the Òsteppe eneolithic line of developmentÓ along
which the community of Arian tribes developed. The centre of Ari‡n (known
between the lower reaches of the Dnipro and Kuban as Dandariya until the 2nd – 4th centuries
CE) was concentrated along the steppe borders of Aratta
(where it then existed as Art-Arsania until 9th
– 11th centuries CE). It was here that its Brahmans founded
the Vedic culture of Aratta- Ari‡n that was
the core of the ÒIndo-European language communityÓ.
The formation of the Vedas was principally associated with kurhans (burial
mounds) the prototype of which was Stone Grave (known then as Kur-gal or Kur-an). This was an epithet of the creator-God Enlil
who was known there from inscriptions of the 8th – 7th
millenia BCE. From him were derived Slavic Lel, Indo-Arian Lilith and Jewish Eloi.
The most ancient kurhans appeared in the Ukrainian Dnipro area on the expanses of Ari‡n and Oriana, the coastal arms of Aratta.
During the mid 3rd – 2nd millennia BCE, Oriana was a centre of considerable migrations between Bharata (India) and Paphlagonia, Troad and elsewhere (Asia Minor). This movement continued
from Troad to Etruria (Italy) and to the Adriatic and
from there to the Carpathians, Baltic and Pannonia.
Striking similarities between myths and legends of different nations
from Classical times suggest a basis in real historical events and characters,
especially when compared with ancient Slavic texts such as The Veles Book. There the roots of Slavdom from northern Hyperborea
and southern Oriana are traced, through the Leleges and Pelasgians to Troy
and Delos. Furthermore, between the 2nd – 1st
millennia BCE, some of the migrants returned to the Dnipro
area – and in this movement the ethnonyms ÒRusyÓ (Ruses) and
ÒSlavianeÓ(Slavs)
became known for the first time. Nevertheless, their origins go back to at
least 2300-1700 BCE for, as the book explains, it is only during that period of
time, when the solar zodiac was led by Taurus, that the divine tandem of the
Slavic gods Svaroh and Dazhboh-Svarozhych
could have existed.
Later chapters, referring to more recent histories, trace the ethnic
developments from Orissa and Borusia as the general Slavic homeland, through the
Cimmerians and Scythians of the northern Black Sea, together with the Venety and Ants, to the social traditions and faith of Kyivan Rus. However, because the
historical record of The Veles Book (and others) harks back 20,000 –
21,000 years, there is a reminder to seek the real ethnogenesis
of Slavdom not only in the most ancient State of Aratta but also in the depths of its previous formation
during the times of mammoth hunters. It is hoped that appropriate
re-publications of The Slavic Veda (the Orianian
forerunner of the Indo-Arian Vedas), The
Veles Book and The Law of the Empress, i.e. Shu-Nun
(as Stone Grave was called in ancient times), will supplement additional data
on Slavic history.
In summary, the latest scientific studies point to the Slavic people
(eastern in particular) being not only the core of Arian and Indo-European
people but also of all human civilization. In mapping this core of global
civilization from the 20th millenium BCE
up to its termination with the conversion of Rus to
Christianity in CE 879, it is hoped that this book will worthily serve the
grand matter of the rapprochement of nations and lead towards the development
of a new universal civilization.
ÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉÉ
CONTENTS
Preface (by translaters Dr. Timothy Hooker, Heatherle Hooker and Dr. Volodymyr Krasnoholovets)
Introduction
The
Origins of Civilisation and the urgency of their
clarification
1.
History
began in Aratta.
2.
Is the
Òall-powerful doctrineÓ of historical-materialism
correct?
3.
The
Trinity paradigm – the latest methodology of a world view.
Chapter I
The
Chronicle of Shu-Nun
1.
The beginning
of the Great Neolithic Revolution.
2.
The
Circum-Pontic zone.
3.
The
problem of the Indo-European language community.
Chapter 2
The
Origin of Civilization
1.
The
beginning of the Great Neolithic Revolution on Ukrainian Territory.
2.
Buh-Dniester and Sursk-Dnipro archaeological cultures.
3.
Ethno-historical
interpretation of memorials (archaeological findings).
Chapter 3
The
most ancient state in the world - Aratta
1. The appearance of the state of Aratta.
2. Aratta of the interfluve
of the Danube and Dnipro.
3. Persian and Indian Aratta.
Chapter 4
Ari‡n
- the country of Arians
1.
The
problem of Arians in historiography.
2.
Discovery
of the lower Dnipro ancestral homeland of Arians.
3.
Arians:
An historical sketch from Aratta to Bharatta.
Chapter 5
The
Dark Ages of Europe
1.
Atlantis,
Pelasgia, Hyperborea.
2.
"Super
Northern" Apollo and his followers.
3.
From Hyperborea to Troy and Delos.
Chapter 6
The Veles book
and its place in ancient literature
1. The germination of the Vedas.
2. The general root of the Indo-European epos.
3. Sources and research into the problem of the beginnings of Rus.
Chapter 7
The eternal depths of Slavdom
1. In the times of mammoths.
2. The middle of the Stone Age.
3. The foundation of Aratta.
Chapter 8
From
Aratta to Hyperborea
1.
The Arattan stratum of pre-Slavic culture.
2. The pre-Slavic appearance of Sumer and Oriana.
3. The general well-spring
of Slavs and Pelasgians.
Chapter 9
The
germination of Ukraine and Rus
1. Leleges — Lida — Rusians.
2. Enety — Veneti.
3. Who are the Rus?
Chapter 10
The Veles book
- Sources of Slavs and Rus
1. Orissa and Borusia
as the general Slo(a)vian homeland.
2. The Veles Book on the origin of Rus.
3. Social traditions and faith of pre-Kyivan Rus.
Chapter 11
Аncient times
1. Pre-Scythian
Population of the northern Black Sea.
2. Were the Cimmerians expelled by the
Scythians?
3. Rus and Bosphorus.
Chapter 12
The
Emergence of Kyivan Rus
1. The Venedy, Ants and Sklavins.
2. The establishment of Kyiv, the capital of
Rus.
3. ÒGreat land of our ...Ó
Epilogue
Kyan (Ancient Sumer City) — Indo-European dynasty
1.
Kyan, Indo-European dynasty of Oriana-Dandaria.
2. The precepts of the Volhvs.
3. The divine essence of The Veles book.
Conclusion
Sources,
State, Perspectives
– Slavic Studies
1. Upper Palaeolithic.
2. Mesolithic
(9,000 – 7,000 BCE).
3. Neolithic.
4. Eneolithic or
Copper-Stone Age.
5. Bronze Age.
6. Ancient times.
7. Early Middle
Ages.
Conclusions
and outlooks
Tables
1. Appearance and formation of Slavs.
2. Maps and Monuments.
3. Maps etc.